
|
|
This Week's New Postings to AgBiotech InfoNet Archive of Previous Weeks' Postings Highlights and Original Contributions Indicates Link Outside Ag Biotech InfoNet
Indicates Technical Paper
Biotech industry warned to take heed of consumer concerns,
Knight Ridder/Tribune, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, February 22, 2001
Majority of Americans Favor Biofood Labels, Reuters,
February 23, 2001
Bush administration considering creation of Biotech Coordinator,
Knight Ridder/Tribune, Boston Globe, February 23, 2001
Predicted Failure of Mandatory Labels for Genetically Modified Foods,
SCOPE GM Food Controversy Forum, January 20, 2001
FAO report reveals GM crops not needed to feed
the world, August 2000
US data reveals UK GM trials unscientific, Natural Law Party Wessex overview
of the abstracts from the 1998 - 2000 Meetings of the Weed Science
Society of America (WSSA), Volume 38-40, 2000
The Debate Over Food Biotechnology: Is a Societal Consensus Achievable?
Presented at the Symposium on Biotechnology Communications:
Fortune or Fiasco? at the Annual Meeting of the American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), San Francisco
February 19, 2001 by Edward Groth III, Ph.D., Senior Scientist,
Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered
plants, Science 290: p.2088-2093, December 15, 2000 (pdf 315K)
U.S. trade association documents international GMO labeling
initiatives and urges members to help "defeat" Mexican
mandatory labeling bill, January 19, 2001
More US Consumers Expect Biotech Benefits: Mixed Feelings, But Not
Major Concern over Labeling, International Food Information
Council Foundation (IFIC) Background, February 2001
The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: a collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed
recombinant plant material,
European Food Research and Technology, Abstract, Volume 212 Issue 2 (2001)
pp 129-134
On the fate of orally ingested foreign DNA in mice:
chromosomal association and placental transmission to the fetus, Abstract,
Mol Gen Genet (1998) 259: 569-576
Letter from Dr. Gordon Conway to Greenpeace in response to Dr. Vandana
Shiva's Report, "The Golden Hoax" (pdf 7K)
Golden Rice and the Greenpeace Dilemma --
Second Response to Greenpeace's statement, "Genetically Engineered 'Golden Rice' is
Fool's Gold", from Prof. Ingo Potrykus, Feb. 15, 2001
|