What's New?
Impacts & Implications
Industry Mergers & Integration
Rating Biotech Applications
Environmental Impacts
Health Risks
Costs & Benefits
Consumer Choice
Policy

Science & Applications
Insect Resistance
Herbicide Tolerance
Disease Resistance
Other Traits
Other Applications
What's New?
Home

Sources and Links
Search


   This Week's New Postings to AgBiotech InfoNet
   Archive of Previous Weeks' Postings
   Highlights and Original Contributions
 Indicates Link Outside Ag Biotech InfoNet

   

Week of August 13th - August 19th

Aug 13/ Aug 14/Aug 15/Aug 16/Aug 17/Aug 18/Aug 19




Posted on August 16, 2000
The Promise of Plant Biotechnology, The Threat of Genetically Modified Organisms, July 2000 by Patrick Brown -- Professor College of Agriculture & Environmental Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Monsanto Guarantees Roundup Ready System Will Improve Soybean Profits, AgWeb.com - From Pro Farmer, July 31, 2000

The "Political Economy" of Agricultural Biotechnology for the Developing World, by Klaus M. Leisinger, Novartis Research Foundation, Distributed August 3, 2000 by AgBioView list.

Bacillus identity crisis, Nature Biotechnology, August, 2000

How can the developing world protect itself from biotech patent-holders?, letter to Nature from John Barton and Joseph Strauss, August, 2000

Consolidating Control: Plant Variety Rights, Genes and Seeds, by Richard Hindmarsh, Journal of Australian Political Economy, No. 44., Summer 2000

Genetically Modified Plants and the 35S Promoter: Assessing the Risks and Enhancing the Debate, Microb. Ecol. Health Dis.

Minnesota H.F No. 3973, A bill for an act relating to commerce; prohibiting the sale of genetically engineered food unless labeled; providing penalties and remedies; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 325F

Minnesota H.F No. 3820, A bill for an act relating to agriculture; establishing liability for the spread of certain genetically modified organisms; specifying damages; amending Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 18F.02, subdivision 5, and by adding subdivisions; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 18F

Vermont Senate Bill No. 295, Labeling of Genetically-Engineered Agricultural Inputs

Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact, APHIS, Permit Number 91-079-01: tomato; antifreeze gene; staphylococcal Protein A -- the documentation of USDA field trial approval for a tomato engineered with a synthetic version of a winter flounder "anti-freeze" gene.


Posted on August 19, 2000
Enormous Impact of Rice Breeding Efforts Recognized News about Rice and People, August 7, 2000

Under Milkweed, Monarchs May Sway Fate of High-Tech Crops, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, August 7, 2000

Mandatory GM labeling approved in Australia, Feedstuffs, August 7, 2000



                Back to Top
  Graphics Created by Gibson Grafx

Last Updated 8/29/00
information@biotech-info.net