
Alex Avery
IF you buy organic food because you think it's free of the cancer-causing
pesticides used on other farms, think again. "Organic" farmers routinely
spray their crops with naturally occurring pesticides - and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency has classified pyrethrum, a top organic
pesticide, as a "likely human carcinogen."
Feeling paranoid yet? Well, in fact, the EPA made that call in secret,
almost two years ago! The revelation about pyrethrum, with other recent
findings, calls into question the superiority of organic farming.
For decades, activists have claimed that organic food is healthier and
kinder to the environment than "chemically farmed" food. Organic farmers,
for example, didn't use synthetic pesticides.
What most people don't realize - and activists try to hide - is that
organic farmers are allowed to use a wide array of natural chemicals as
pest killers. Moreover, these natural poisons pose the same theoretical
(but remote) dangers as the synthetic pesticides so hated by organic
devotees.
Last year, we learned that rotenone, a natural insecticide squeezed from
roots of tropical plants, causes symptoms of Parkinson's disease in rats.
Now we learn of the EPA's pyrethrum decision.
The EPA's Cancer Assessment Review Committee based its 1999 decision on
the same high-dose rat tests long used by eco-activists to condemn
synthetic pesticides. Because no one knows just how pyrethrum causes
tumors, the committee also recommended assuming that even the tiniest dose
can be deadly. (The same logic is used to brand hundreds of other
chemicals as carcinogens.)
Charles Benbrook, a long-time organic activist, notes that pyrethrum is
applied to crops at low rates and that pyrethrum degrades relatively
rapidly, minimizing consumer exposure. He's right, but all this is true of
today's non-persistent synthetic pesticides as well.
Pyrethrum and modern synthetic pesticides break down so rapidly that
consumers are rarely exposed to any at all. Two-thirds of all fruits and
vegetables tested as they leave the farm in the U.S. have no detectable
pesticide residues - despite our being able to detect chemicals at parts
per trillion levels. (That's equivalent to 1 second in 31,000 years!)
Pyrethrum is extracted from a type of chrysanthemum grown mainly in
Africa. It is literally a nerve poison that these plants evolved to fight
off munching insects. The dried, ground-up flowers were used in the early
19th century to control body lice.
In fact, many of the widely used synthetic pesticides are based on natural
plant-defense chemicals. Synthetic versions of pyrethrum (known as
pyrethroids) make it possible to protect a crop with one or two sprays
instead of spraying natural pyrethrum five to seven times at higher
volumes.
Organic activists hold to the twisted logic that if a toxic chemical can
be squeezed from a plant or mined from the earth, it's OK - but a safer
chemical synthesized in a lab is unacceptable.
It is possible to farm without pesticides, as demonstrated by a farm
family recently highlighted in Organic Gardening magazine. They use a
Shop-Vac and a portable generator in a wheelbarrow to daily suck insects
off crops. Talk about labor-intensive! And even that won't fight fungal or
bacterial diseases, or insects that eat crops from the inside out. Organic
coffee growers in Guatemala spray coffee trees with fermented urine as a
primitive fungicide.
Bruce Ames, noted cancer expert and recent winner of the National Medal of
Science, notes that more than half of the natural food chemicals he tests
come up carcinogenic - the same proportion as synthetic chemicals. These
natural chemicals are collectively present in large amounts in the very
fruits and vegetables that are our biggest defense against cancer.
Medical and health authorities are unanimous in their recommendation of
five to seven servings of fruits and vegetables per day to ward off cancer
With global food demand set to more than double in the next 50 years and
one-third of the planet's wildlife habitat already converted to farmland,
humanity must responsibly use pesticides to produce more per acre.
There simply are no compelling reasons to demand chemical-free farming.
Alex Avery is director of research at the Hudson Institute's Center for
Global Food Issues in Churchville, Va.
** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed for research and educational purposes only. **
|
|
|
Last Updated on 6/4/01 Email: information@biotech-info.net |
|