Industry Mergers & Integration




A Note from Ag BioTech InfoNet --

For years people have raised as an issue the impact of consolidation -- and the merger of the seed industry into the pesticide-biotech industry -- on the availability of GMO versus conventional versus "pure" seed supplies. In some parts of the Cornbelt in recent years, there have been anecdotal reports of shortages of non-GMO varieties adapted to certain soils and climates. For an overview of overall trends in the supply of conventional and GMO corn and soybean seed varieties offered in 2000, see ().

A February 14, 2001 letter from Rodney Nelson, a North Dakota farmer, to "Cropchoice" () appears below. If what this producer has experienced emerges as a common occurrence, and the U.S. losses more ground in its international markets -- for both conventional and organic grains and oilseeds -- there will be many more farmers raising this, and other questions this time next year.

February 14, 2001

Dear Cropchoice:

I have been offered $1.25 a bushel over market for 100% pure non- GMO soybeans of certain varieties that happen to be popular varieties in my area.

This contract is being offered through a local grain elevator near Fargo, ND. I thought it sounded too good to be true. I immediately went to work to try and purchase at least 1 of these varieties. I then learned the disappointing news. Not 1 of the seed companies could guarantee non-GMO purity. In fact, one of the seed dealers actually laughed at me when I told him I needed the seed to be certified as 100% pure non-GMO. He told that would be impossible and that he didn't think any seed company selling soybean seed today would attempt or be able to make such a guarantee. The buyer offering the contract later told me he realizes this problem. He was simply stating that this market offering the premium was an Asian market and that was the price that he could offer me if I could supply the non-GMO crop. Up here in North Dakota, we have essentially only been growing GMO soybeans commercially for 2 years and already it appears nearly all varieties are too contaminated for some markets. As if things weren't bad enough in farming today, now we have this mess--limited markets and government bailouts to farmers.

All this so the big biotech seed companies can continue to develop and sell more seeds that are resistant to their own chemicals. In my opinion, paying 5 times as much for soybean seed as compared to binrun (saved) seed, then raising a crop that yields less than non-GMO varieties and then finally selling that crop at a discount at the elevator on top of having the whole market depressed due to the GMO issue doesn't pencil out very good on my farm.

I would think that the taxpayers in this country would not stand for this much longer.

Sincerely,
Rodney Nelson
Amenia, ND

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for research and educational purposes only. **



Last Updated on 2/15/01
Email: information@biotech-info.net

What's New?
Home
Industry Mergers & Integration