
Mike Kepp
RIO DE JANEIRO--Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso in mid-July
signed a transgenic labeling decree (Decree No. 3,871) meant to pave the
way for commercialization of genetically modified (GM) crops and packaged
foodstuffs.
However, environmental and consumer advocacy groups, who call the measures
wholly inadequate, plan to try to legally block the decree if they cannot
get Cardoso to revoke it.
Although the courts have blocked the commercialization of transgenic crops
in Brazil, the issue still has not been settled.
In August 2000, for instance, a federal appeals court upheld a 1998 ruling
blocking the sale of Monsanto's genetically modified Roundup Ready(TM) soy
seeds pending environmental-impact rules and development of health and
safety regulations, including the labeling of transgenic foodstuffs.
Both the government and Monsanto argue that genetically altered seed
varieties will safely improve crop yields and reduce farmers' reliance on
pesticides and herbicides.
However, since Monsanto lost the 2000 appeal, the government has been
preparing environmental-impact norms and drafting health and safety
regulations--such as the transgenic labeling decree--that would allow for
the commercialization of GM crops and packaged foodstuffs.
A technical team of the National Environmental Council (Conama) is drawing
up norms for environmental impact statements needed to get a Conama license
to commercialize GM products, an Agriculture Ministry source told BNA July
24.
The team is composed of representatives from all the federal government
ministries and state governments, as well as nongovernmental organizations
and private-sector representatives.
4 Percent Solution
The National Technical Commission for Bio-Security (CTNBio), the government
agency overseeing the transgenics issue, has not said whether it will make
them product-specific, Paulo Borges, the Agriculture Ministry's
representative on the CTNBio, told BNA July 24. CTNBio has already set down
general bio-security norms for cultivating transgenic crops.
But Borges said that before transgenic products can be sold, the CTNBio
will have to analyze and approve them. In fact, the government wants
environmental and biosafety norms in place soon so that it can allow the
commercial use of five different types of GM soybean seeds in Brazil,
Agriculture Minister Marcus Vinicius Pratini de Moraes told the O Estado de
Sao Paulo newspaper July 21.
Agriculture Ministry press spokesman Miguel Bueno July 23 confirmed the
minister's comments.
The labeling decree is the government's most recent step in allowing for
the commercialization of GM products. The decree says that, as of January
2002, GM food product ingredients--each of which accounts for over 4
percent of the weight of a foodstuff--must be clearly labeled as such in
Portuguese.
Because the decree allows for this 4 percent limit to apply to each GM
ingredient, if a foodstuff has five GM ingredients, each of which accounts
for up to--but not more than--4 percent of the foodstuff, that foodstuff
can be 20 percent composed of GM ingredients and still not require GM
labeling, Sezifredo Paz, technical consultant for the Brazilian Institute
of Consumer Defense (IDEC), a consumer advocacy group, told BNA July 23.
Transgenic End Run?
It is this provision in the decree that particularly alarms consumer
advocacy groups like IDEC, which sought and was granted the injunction that
blocked the sale of Roundup Ready.
Paz told BNA that in Europe, products with transgenic ingredients that
exceed 1 percent (the share of each GM-ingredient allowed in GM corn and
soy, the only two transgenic products allowed to be sold in Europe) must be
labeled. He compared that to the much higher 4 percent limit in the
Brazilian transgenic labeling decree.
Paz also outlined some of the labeling decree's other "holes," including
provisions that:
only require GM labeling on packaged or bottled foods (not produce) and
do not require GM products such as soy oil and chocolate containing soy to
be GM labeled because labeling requirements are based on a detectable
presence of DNA, something that has been processed out of soy oil and
chocolate containing soy.
IDEC also argued that the GM labeling decree should include some form of
fine or other punishment for violating the labeling standards, something it
currently does not do.
Possible Court Action
"This labeling decree, besides allowing foodstuffs to contain a high
percentage of each GM ingredient, allows some GM foodstuffs like soy oil,
or ingredients in GM foodstuffs, not to have to carry a GM label," Paz
said. "If we can't convince President Cardoso to sign a more
consumer-protective labeling decree, IDEC will try to get it overturned in
the courts."
The one-page decree, which includes general guidelines but lacks detail,
calls for an interministerial commission to be set up within 60 days to
review it and, if necessary, draft complementary legislation with more
specific rules and regulations to implement the labeling decree.
The commission most likely will be composed of officials from the
ministries that helped draw up the decree--the ministries of Agriculture,
Environment, Health, and Justice.
** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed for research and educational purposes only. **
|
|
|
Last Updated on 8/7/01 Email: information@biotech-info.net |
|