
Suman Sahai
I was travelling through some villages in Wardha district
recently, talking to farmers. Wardha is situated in the cotton
growing belt of Maharashtra and its farmers are quite aware
about agricultural developments, at least compared to their
counterparts in many other parts of the country. We talked about
the situation of cotton farmers of the region, and the talk
quickly turned to Bt cotton, both the new genetically engineered
hybrids sanctioned by the government as also the Bt cotton crop
planted by the illegal seeds supplied by Navbharat seed company
last year. Several interesting points came up during the
discussion, many pertinent to the economics of cultivating the
Bt cotton varieties of Mahyco-Monsanto.
At present, farmers in Wardha and other regions of Vidarbha,
predominantly grow hybrid cotton. Some continue to grow the
'desi' or local cotton but these are a minority. The principal
source of the hybrid seeds is private companies although there
are some varieties supplied by the Punjab Rao Deshmukh
Agricultural University located in Wardha and by the Gujarat
government. All the hybrid seeds available are priced between
Rs. 300 to Rs. 450 per 450 gm bag . This odd size is standard
here although packages of 750 gm. are also sold.
Working out the economics of cotton cultivation, the farmers
explained that they need about 1 kg of seed per acre which
works out to a cost of Rs. 700 to Rs. 900 per acre depending on
the variety. For our calculations, let us take an average of
Rs. 800 per acre. Pesticide sprayings work out to another Rs.
1000 per acre. Wardha and almost all of Vidarbha is rainfed so
the yields are lower compared to the irrigated areas in Punjab
and Haryana. The average cotton yields are around 3 quintals per
acre in this region. The farmers here are demanding a monopoly
pricing system because cotton prices have been plummeting these
past few years, the whole situation being exacerbated by the
government's ad hoc decisions to import cotton, causing cotton
prices to crash further.
In this situation, two new varieties of cotton, one legal and
the other illegal, have become available to farmers. The Mahyco
-Monsanto varieties are to be priced at Rs. 1600 per bag . The
economics in this case, will work out like this : Cost of seed
per acre will go up to Rs 3200. If pesticide use is reduced
because of the Bt toxin, say even by as much as a dramatic 60% ,
savings on pesticide will work out to Rs. 600 per acre. The
yield will not be affected much since Bt cotton has not been
bred to confer a yield advantage but the advantage of disease
resistance. The main reason the yields will not go up in any
significant way is because of the lack of irrigation facilities.
So the economics of Mahyco- Monsanto's Bt cotton look very
unfavourable for the farmer. A total outlay of Rs. 3600 ( 3200
for seed + 400 for pesticide ) as against Rs. 1800 per acre in
the old system ( 800 for seed + 1000 for pesticide ). This
means an increased net outlay of Rs. 1800, which is exactly
double! This increased cost can not be made up by higher yield,
for the reasons explained above.
Rumours are rife in the villages of this cotton belt. The
propaganda and rumours through the local grapevine have many
interesting, if tragic aspects. The farmers are being told that
yields will go up phenomenally and the higher seed costs will be
more than offset by higher volumes of cotton produced per acre.
This still does not solve their problem of getting a decent
price but it sounds attractive! Others had heard that the
government had made it compulsory to buy the Monsanto cotton
and
seed of other varieties would only be supplied if the Monsanto
variety were also bought. In some villages we heard the farmers
describing that credit would be available only for the Mahyco
-Monsanto seeds. Another variation on this was that if farmers
did not buy the Monsanto seed, their credit lines would be
blocked. All these rumours point to one unhappy fact, the
perception that the government was adamant on pushing the
Mahyco-Monsanto hybrids at all costs. This will have
repercussions in various ways later.
On the other hand, is the availability of the cotton seed being
supplied from Gujarat by those farmers who had harvested their
crops planted with Navbharat's illegal seeds last year. Eleven
thousand acres of the illegal crop have yielded a lot of seeds .
Since the Genetic Engineering Approval Committee ( GEAC) in a
spectacular display of incompetence had failed over a period of
several months, to take any action when Navbharat's
transgressions came to light, the market is awash with the
illegal, unregulated cotton variety , making a public mockery of
India's ability to regulate and direct the use of this new and
controversial technology. Not just in Maharashtra, these illegal
seeds are being sold openly this season in Andhra Pradesh,
Punjab, Haryana and of course, Gujarat. Although the reports
from Tamil Nadu have not yet been confirmed but chances are high
that Navbharat's seeds are available there too.
Let us look at the economics in this case. Navbharat seeds are
selling at Rs. 100 per bag since they are illegal . A little
like selling on the black market, at a lower cost. Cost of seed
works out to Rs. 200 per acre and there will be some savings on
pesticide costs. Certainly a better return than with the
officially sponsored Monsanto varieties! For a few seasons at
any rate, the farmer will have access to a cotton variety with
favourable economics After that when the variety fails, nobody
is responsible and the victim as always , is the farmer, left
alone to cope with disasters heaped upon his head without his
knowledge. Any one who has seen the field will tell you that
non-standard seeds of indifferent quality are one of the biggest
problems facing cotton farmers . The failure of the GEAC to
regulate or to take punitive action against Navbharat has
emboldened every fly-by-night seed operator to take the farmer
for a ride.
After the Gujarat harvest, large volumes of Navbharat's Bt seed
have arrived in the market. Reports are coming in of hole- in-
the-wall companies, often one- man operations that are selling
magical Bt cotton seeds through advertisements. Many of these
phoney operators are not even aware of what Bt means or what its
supposed actions are. One source out of Gujarat supplying to
gullible farmers in Punjab, claimed he had bred his own Bt
cotton. Another sent out leaflets to farmers about the 20 other
Bt cotton varieties that would soon be available through other
seed companies. As this mayhem plays out, there is not one
single action taken by the government. No rebuttals of the crazy
claims are being made, no damage control exercise, no
information campaign to warn the farmer against fake seed
operators out to fleece him. The farmer, as so often before, is
being readied once again for the slaughter, this time almost
with the complicity of the government .
In this utterly confused scenario where both science and policy
have been thrown to the winds, there are those who are arguing
that so what if the varieties fail in a few years, why not let
the farmers enjoy a few good harvests. The other argument goes
that if the farmer finds out (after growing the crop and
indebting himself) that the variety is not profitable, he will
abandon it by himself. Both these arguments can only be made by
city people. If the farmer finds out after the harvest that he
has lost money and can not repay his debt, who bails him out
then ? And when the variety fails because the bollworm has
become resistant to Bt, like the mosquitoes did to DDT, what
solutions are there to offer the farmer so that he can continue
growing cotton ? At that time these armchair theorists will be
hard to find.
As for implementation, the farmers do not see any reason to
leave a 20% refuge if they were to grow Monsanto's genetically
engineered cotton. The hype extolling the variety has been so
excessive and so assiduously promoted by the scientific
community and the government departments that almost unrealistic
expectations have been built up. If this cotton is so super,
why, argue the farmers, should they deny themselves the benefit
from the remaining 20 % of their land. The scientific community
and the administration has concentrated solely on promoting the
new varieties . They have not bothered to educate the farmers
about the drawbacks of the technology, its prescribed
methodology and the dangers of not following proper procedure,
for instance , of not leaving a non-Bt refuge for the bollworm
to retain susceptibility to Bt varieties.
Faced with defiant farmers who do not see the logic of 'wasting'
20% of their land, the government is now finding it difficult to
convince farmers that this fantastic technology they were
promoting all along, does indeed have a downside. Scientists and
agriculture departments are already admitting that they have a
problem on their hands since the farmers do not intend to follow
any instructions about demarcating insect refuges. To make
matters worse, populist farm leaders with political ambitions
are playing low level vote politics and making dramatic
pronouncements about how nobody will tell the farmers what to
do. The farmers will decide what to grow and how to grow it !
Little knowledge is indeed a dangerous thing. The government
must recognise the chaos it has created and take corrective
steps. For instance, a new, more competent and transparent GEAC
must be set up immediately, technologies must be relevant to the
needs of small farmers and should be introduced only after
educating them. India, which has significant technical skills in
the field of agriculture, must develop self-reliance in
technology. There is no reason for the Indian establishment to
function as the purveyors of MNC technologies , specially with
their incumbent baggage of patents.
Suman Sahai of Gene Campaign has penned down a travel diary of
her visit to the cotton belt in Gujarat and Maharashtra.
** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. **
|
|
|
Last Updated on 7/1/02 Email: information@biotech-info.net |
|