
April 5, 2000
WASHINGTON -- Recommendations put forth today
in a National Research Council report entitled "Genetically Modified
Pest Protected Plants: Science and Regulation" are well-founded in fact and
science. All are either already in place or being addressed by industry,
said Dr. Val Giddings, vice president for food and agriculture of the
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO).
"It is also noteworthy that the Council's scientific committee reached
consensus that there is no evidence that foods improved through
biotechnology are unsafe to eat as a result of genetic modification," said
Dr. Giddings, a geneticist. "Moreover, the report recommends the use of
insect-protected crops (such as cotton, corn and soybeans) to promote
biodiversity, an issue that has been a subject of concern to biotech
opponents," noted Dr. Giddings.
According to their report, the committee found that advances in conventional
plant breeding, "have often lessened the need for chemicals" and that
techniques such as those employed to modify crops through biotechnology
"have the potential to make similar contributions, as has already been
documented with transgenic pest-protected cotton."
The committee also recommended additional research in a number of areas for
two reasons -- first to form more solid databases for traditionally grown
crops; and second to generate comparison data on plants derived through
biotechnology to continue to enhance scientific risk assessment and support
the public's confidence in the safety and benefits of these crops.
"The current regulatory framework has served the U.S. extremely well for the
past 14 years," Dr. Giddings said. "Nevertheless, we support the continued
development of information to confirm and enhance the safety assessment of
plant biotechnology products and to make this information more publicly
available."
"We welcome this timely report which will reassure consumers on the
thoroughness of the scientific scrutiny in place by U.S. regulatory
agencies. Our experience gained through research and testing has shown us
that biotechnology brings enormous existing and potential benefits -- from
improving the stewardship of agricultural lands to helping developing
countries feed growing populations and improving the nutritional content of
food," said Dr. Giddings.
"It is critical that we all understand the importance of biotechnology in
our lives -- and that foods derived thorough biotechnology continue to be
more thoroughly tested than any other in human history."
BIO represents more than 900 companies, academic institutions and biotech
centers in 47 states and 26 nations. BIO members are involved in the
research and development of healthcare, agricultural, industrial and
environmental products.
For more information:
Additional information about agricultural biotechnology can be found at
www.bio.org, www.whybiotech.com
or by calling 1-800-980-8660. The NAS report
can be viewed in its entirety at www.nas.edu.
** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for research and educational purposes only. ** |
|
|
Last Updated on 4/8/00 By Rachel C. Benbrook Email: karen@biotech-info.net |
|